13 payments ($9,801) with no purpose given, $9,801 of it to the candidate or family
Every itemized payment on a report must say what it was for. These leave it blank. Payments to the candidate or their family are allowed only as pay for work they did, so a payment to them with no purpose is worth asking about.
What to check
- The committee may have amended the report to add the purposes.
- Whether each payment is a reimbursement, pay for work, repayment of a loan the candidate made to the campaign, or something else.
The entries (13)
| Name | Who | Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-10-12 | $1,210 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-09-14 | $1,178 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-04-01 | $936 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-06-01 | $923 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-07-01 | $915 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-12-01 | $867 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-11-01 | $833 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-04-30 | $806 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-02-01 | $602 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-12-31 | $535 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-03-03 | $420 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-08-02 | $327 |
| Neil Anderson | the candidate | 2021-01-04 | $249 |
Rule: Payments with no purpose given
“the full name and mailing address of each person to whom expenditures have been made by the committee or candidate within the reporting period in an aggregate amount or value in excess of $150; the amount, date, and purpose of each of those expenditures”10 ILCS 5/9-11(a)(12) ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how findings work